ChatGPT vs. Google Gemini in Financial Services

6 min readFeb 9, 2024

This article offers an in-depth comparison between two leading artificial intelligence models, OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini, with a focus on their application within the financial services sector.

Introduction

ChatGPT: Developed by OpenAI, ChatGPT is a powerful large language model (LLM) chatbot. It excels at generating human-quality text, translating languages, writing different kinds of creative content, and answering your questions in an informative way.
Google Gemini: Google’s answer to ChatGPT, Gemini is a suite of powerful AI models. At its core is the ‘Ultra’ model, noted for its multimodal nature. This means Gemini can process and understand not just text, but also images, videos, and audio.

Feature Comparison

Use Case: Which Works Best?

Here’s how the strengths of each model align with different business needs:

ChatGPT Excels:

Customer Service Chatbots
Content Creation (Blog posts, marketing copy)
Language Translation
Coding assistance

Google Gemini Shines:

Image and Video Analysis and Captioning
Product Descriptions based on Visual Input
Audio Transcription and Translation
Multi-faceted Customer Support (using images/videos in explanations)

Example: Customer Service

ChatGPT: Interacts with customers through text-based conversations, answering FAQs, resolving basic issues, and assisting with order placement.
Google Gemini: Provides support through text, but also accepts customer-submitted images or videos of problems and can give troubleshooting instructions incorporating those visuals.

Potential Use Cases in Financial Services

The financial sector presents unique challenges that both AI models are well-equipped to tackle:

Financial Report Summarization:

Challenge: Financial reports are dense and full of technical jargon.
ChatGPT: Can process reports and generate plain-language summaries, making them accessible to investors without specialized knowledge.
Google Gemini: Could add visual summaries like charts and graphs drawn from the data within the report, further enhancing comprehension.

Personalized Financial Advice:

Challenge: Financial advisors are costly, and accessible financial planning guidance is limited.
ChatGPT: Can leverage a client’s provided financial data (with explicit consent and security measures) to offer tailored insights, budgeting tips, and even potentially suggest basic investment strategies.
Google Gemini: Might combine this with analysis of macroeconomic news and visual depictions of market trends, giving a broader context to recommendations.

Fraud Detection:

Challenge: Identifying fraudulent transactions and patterns in large datasets is crucial.
Both ChatGPT and Gemini: Can potentially be trained on historical fraud data, flagging anomalies in transaction patterns as well as the textual context (merchant descriptions, etc.). Google Gemini’s multimodal ability could potentially even analyze video footage from ATMs or payment locations for additional verification.

Customer Sentiment Analysis:

Challenge: Tracking customer feelings about financial products or the general market is difficult.
ChatGPT: Can analyze customer service logs, social media chatter, and even earnings call transcripts to gauge overall sentiment.
Google Gemini: Adds analysis of customer-provided videos (feedback, complaints) for a more nuanced understanding of the emotional responses.

Considerations and Limitations

Regulation: The financial sector mandates strict data privacy and compliance. Any AI solution must meet stringent security standards.
Explainability: Recommendations, especially investment-related ones, must be accompanied by reasoning the user can understand to build trust.
Data Bias: Training datasets must be curated carefully. Biased data can lead to prejudiced financial advice or discriminatory fraud alerts.

Which is better: ChatGPT or Google Gemini?

In the financial services space, a cautious approach could dictate:

Near-term: ChatGPT excels in language-focused tasks (report summaries, sentiment analysis on texts). Its accessibility is an advantage.
Monitoring Gemini: The multimodal focus could open doors to innovative analysis of financial news and video-based fraud detection. However, it will depend on Google’s roll-out and emphasis on features related to finance.

Important Note: Financial applications of AI come with high stakes. Meticulous development, testing, and compliance oversight are non-negotiable.

Refining the “Personalized Financial Advice” Use Case

To make this tangible, let’s outline some key steps and highlight how each AI solution might contribute.

Step 1: Client Data Gathering

Secure Platform: Data security is paramount. This would need a specialized platform designed specifically for clients to submit financial information.
Data Scope: This includes income, expenses, debt, existing savings/investments, and possibly risk tolerance questionnaires.
Conversational Approach (ChatGPT): Could make the process less intimidating than filling a rigid form. Guiding questions tailored to the individual’s situation ensure thorough input.

Step 2: Analysis & Insights

ChatGPT’s Role:

Analyze textual data: Expenses categorized, potential budget improvements flagged, debt consolidation suggested (if applicable).
Compare a user’s financial profile against broader datasets to highlight savings percentiles or areas where spending is atypical (needs client validation).

Gemini’s Potential:

If clients were open to connecting external accounts (API level integration), Gemini could potentially track past spending trends to confirm provided data.
More advanced: Analysis of economic news videos and client risk tolerance to guide the type of investment suggestions.

Step 3: Tailored Recommendations

ChatGPT’s Strength: Clear, understandable language to explain recommendations aligned to a client’s financial goals (retirement, home purchase, etc.). Can ‘translate’ financial jargon into plain terms.

Gemini’s Addition: Visual aids!

Charts outlining different savings strategies over time.
Simulated portfolio performance (risk vs. reward) based on video content/news analysis of different market sectors.

Advantages of this AI-Advisor Hybrid

Accessibility: Reduces costs compared to a human advisor, opening up sound financial planning to more people.
Demystifying Finance: Both ChatGPT’s plain-language explanations and Gemini’s potential visuals break down complex concepts.
Scalability: Once the base models are trained, scaling the service becomes significantly easier than onboarding numerous human advisors.

Important Considerations

The Human Touch: Complex financial situations or major life changes likely still warrant consultation with a real advisor. The AI could guide when that escalation is appropriate.
Regulation: The “advice” must be carefully framed to not violate any financial regulations. AI may be best at “what-if” scenarios and flagging options for further exploration.
Oversimplification: Both the text and visual aids need to avoid misleading clients as to the guarantees or risks associated with their choices.

Next Steps to Imagine

Gamification: Elements of gamification might encourage better financial behaviors. Gemini could visualize progress toward goals over time.
Community Integration (Anonymized/Aggregated): Using anonymized data, the AI could suggest strategies proven successful for others in similar financial situations.

Step-by-Step Implementation Guide

Here’s a general outline of how to implement either AI tool (note that specifics may vary based on the platform and your business):

1- Define Your Goals:

What specific problems do you want to solve?
How do you envision the AI enhancing your operations?

2- Choose Your Tool:

Based on your goals and use case analysis above, select either ChatGPT or Google Gemini.

3- API Integration or Platform Use:

API: If a custom, in-house solution is needed, explore the APIs of each service. This involves development work.
Platform: Both OpenAI and Google offer platforms to interact with the models without much coding. This would be simpler for many use cases.

4- Train and Fine-Tune:

Feed both models data specific to your business (product catalogs, FAQs, etc.) to boost accuracy in your domain.

5- Deployment:

Integrate the chosen solution into your website, customer service system, or internal tools.

6- Monitoring and Improvement:

Analyze the AI’s performance, gather user feedback, and continuously refine the model to ensure it provides the best results.

Important Considerations:

Data Privacy: Ensure that the chosen solution follows responsible data handling practices in compliance with regulations.
Bias: LLMs can reflect biases present in training data. Actively work to mitigate this.
Cost: Factor in subscription fees or API usage costs when making your decision.

Conclusion

Both ChatGPT and Google Gemini hold significant promise for the financial services industry, each bringing unique strengths to the table. While ChatGPT offers unparalleled text-based analysis and interaction, Google Gemini’s multimodal capabilities open new avenues for engaging with and understanding financial information.

As these technologies continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly play a pivotal role in shaping the future of financial advisory services, making expert advice more accessible and comprehensible to a broader audience.

If you would like to connect with me to have in dept conversation about this topic please get in touch here or via Linkedin.